> how many people do you think understand the Linux kernel in full?

"Not many people understand some things fully" is so massively different from "the human mind is incapable of understanding some things that AI will understand for us"

Yeah. We're only starting the journey of building tools better at thinking than the human mind, so expecting me to have examples of things it produces is a little hard, don't you think?

The best I can do is things that are incomprehensible to nearly everyone, but still provide value. There's a small leap of imagination to consider an author that understands it and can show others how to leverage results without understanding be mechanical rather than biological.