It's kind of like folks wielding gen ai and calling themselves artists.

Questionable output, generally shunned by artisans.

But possibly good enough for some.

Artists are biased when evaluating AI art (same with programmers evaluating AI code).

	▲	DJBunnies 24 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I'm not so sure. I think it's fair to say that only people who can output good art / code are qualified to evaluate the output of ai. It's like how product people / C levels have absolutely no understanding of what makes for good code or a good engineering shop (aside from perceived costs.)