I'm not a lawyer, but if there are (severe enough) flaws in the filings the case can be thrown out already. Adding a clause for AI-generated flaws does nothing.

▲

ktallett an hour ago | parent [-]

It would be important to add as it removes the proof of competency of the lawyer if using AI to aid the case.

▲

RobotToaster 15 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

This was a litigant in person not a lawyer, most courts basically assume they're incompetent.

▲

dist-epoch an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

What happens if AI becomes more competent than lawyers at law? Should then 100% human fillings be thrown out automatically?

	▲	happymellon 28 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Let me know when that happens and we can discuss it. Until then...