| ▲ | massysett a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This all supposes that the sports team owners really are that: independent owners. Sure that’s what we call them, but it’s more accurate to say they are equity partners in a common enterprise. It’s not interesting to say that a sports league controls whether there is a new team. Of course it does, just as an existing supermarket chain decides where to open new stores, or an airline decides what cities to fly to. Competition for a sports league comes from other leagues (not necessarily in the same sport) or from different forms of entertainment entirely. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kevin_thibedeau a day ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> equity partners That implies equitable treatment. The reality is there is a class of filthy rich people that make a game of shaking down government bodies to pay for their entertainment venues so they can swim in more money on the public dime. Equitable would be if a public entity invests 60% into a stadium, they get 60% of the revenue. No billionaire grifter will allow that to happen. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||