| ▲ | vrganj 18 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So between the giant radiator per GPU and the diminished compute capacity, how much mass are we shooting up exactly? This just seems utterly infeasible. You're missing C) SpaceX engineers know it's a bad idea, but can't say anything because it's the tyrant manchild's latest obsession, technology constraints be damned. Remember the vision-only FSD? How's that coming along? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ethbr1 18 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> because it's the tyrant manchild's latest obsession, technology constraints be damned. Imho, there's only one reason that justifies Musk's space-based compute obsession: sovereignty. Specifically, avoiding terrestrial country's. This isn't about AI in space (though I'm sure dumb investors love that), it's about uncensorable Twitter in space, beamed down to Starlink terminals. Which would be one of the few things you'd care about, if you were one of the richest people on the planet... but still subject to those damned nations and their meddling laws. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||