| ▲ | modeless an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||
So as of a month ago their best internal model was "somewhat more capable" than Mythos "but does not display a capability jump of the degree observed from Claude Opus 4.6 to Mythos Preview." I thought they would have a significantly more capable model by then, more than five months after Mythos finished training. They'd better have one by now, or the Chinese competitors are closer to catching up than I thought. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lumost 41 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I'm still uncertain if mythos is real. Subsequent model releases have been lackluster, no one has claimed to verify mythos performance and it's silently vanished from most comparisons. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | andai an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
You thought they were gonna double the model size again? Also it occurs to me that they're somewhat incentivized to downplay cyber risks after what happened last time... | |||||||||||||||||