| ▲ | cyanydeez an hour ago |
| So people really underestimate (because of, the implication) the power of money to rewire the brand to excuse larger and larger immoral and unethical behaviors and to permanently not understand how the rest of the reality is being bent to the money bubble illusion. |
|
| ▲ | adastra22 an hour ago | parent [-] |
| Also selection effects. There have been some great leaders in business with a clear moral code. We lost Tony Hsieh way too young. But by and large those at the top got there for a reason. |
| |
| ▲ | cyanydeez an hour ago | parent [-] | | yes, and to get into the billions of dollars of net worth, you need to both ignore more and more problematic things and believe more and more than you deserve all this. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross an hour ago | parent [-] | | > to get into the billions of dollars of net worth, you need to both ignore more and more problematic things Need is too strong, especially if it’s just for becoming a billionaire. One can absolutely amble into that situation. Where I tend to agree is if you choose to keep those billions versus transitioning to charity. | | |
| ▲ | cyanydeez an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | the "need" is POV the person gaining the money. | |
| ▲ | lovich 12 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Come on man. No one is ambling into being a billionaire. There’s a little under 1000 billionaires in the US and the population is estimated at over 349 million. Rounding the billionaires up and the population down to those round numbers and it’s 0.000286532951% of the population getting resources that millions of others are trying to take. | | |
|
|
|
