| ▲ | plantain 2 hours ago | |
1. The subsidy was fixed per kWh at a level that has always been vastly above utility scale BESS. 2. Power usage is flatlining. There is no reason to need transmission upgrades for BESS. Successful projects are colocated at retiring generators, or at existing major grid terminus. 3. Are those benefits worth 4x the price? Noting again, that's 4x the subsidy, not even the actual installed cost which is closer to 8-12x. 4. It would have been cheaper even at just the subsidy rate. | ||
| ▲ | matt2000 an hour ago | parent [-] | |
re: Power usage is flatlining... Where are you getting that? The 2026 AEMO plan says: "Electricity consumption is expected to almost double over the coming decades, driven by population and economic growth, electrification across homes, businesses and industry and the emergence of new large loads such as data centres." https://www.aemo.com.au/-/media/files/major-publications/isp... | ||