| ▲ | lotsofpulp an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||
>Imagine if they charged extra for seat belts, or getting help evacuating after a crash. Why? This isn't happening, and I can't figure out how it is productive to make up a scenario. >But something like charging extra to sit with your travel companions is bullshit. That sort of thing should be strongly rejected. Suppose a plane has seats in groups of 3s, and everyone on the plane is in a group of even number of people. Obviously, seating everyone together is impossible. As a seller, why is it "bullshit" to give the people that do not get to sit with their companion a lower price? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ceejayoz an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Ryanair threatened to make people pay for toilet usage. Airlines are looking at standing seats (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_seat), which would absolutely impact evacuation safety (mainly a concern of bandwidth through the aisle/doors) to save some ticket costs. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2009/mar/05/ryanair-toi... > Obviously, seating everyone together is impossible. We manage it just fine at the movie theater, at sports stadiums, etc. Sometimes you're one row behind. Sometimes the last person to book is in a weird spot. But largely, if you want to sit with your spouse, you'll be able to. At a certain point, the bean counters have to be told no. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wat10000 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The only reason my hypothetical doesn’t happen is because it’s literally illegal. Your scenario doesn’t happen because solo travelers exist and you don’t get an entire plane full of pairs. | |||||||||||||||||