I find Deepseek's house style to be pretty refreshing. It has its own cliches (it does like talking about "seams") but I don't think I've ever caught it saying "load-bearing". I've even watched its thinking where after analyzing some awful legacy code, it started off with "Holy crap". And it certainly doesn't over-comment. I definitely can't one-shot a complex system with it like Fable can, but I prefer iterating over interactive brainstorming sessions anyway.

▲

iamacyborg an hour ago | parent | next [-]

>it does like talking about "seams"

Sounds like it was trained heavily on Opus 4.7.

	▲	chuckadams an hour ago \| parent [-]
		No doubt distilled, but I can't really condemn that practice, given how all models are trained in the first place.

▲

basch 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Can any one run a check of the word masterclass against all the models when describing a clever idea?