| ▲ | disgruntledphd2 3 hours ago | |||||||
Yeah, I actually have started using GPT Sol much much more, as Claude (all of them) were far too trigger happy around making changes, and refused to listen to my requests to take things slowly. Feels like they've overtrained on one-shotting (which does demo well, and presumably converts new subscribers), whereas I want a model to do work for me in small, easily understood changes that I can hold in my head (maybe I'm not smart enough for Claude 4.7+). | ||||||||
| ▲ | D13Fd 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I think you’re right. It’s not optimized for some kinds of work. My little project has a Textual TUI interface that needs to display a few hundred thousand rows in a table. It takes 14 seconds to load in the default datatable component. I instructed Opus 5 to replace the datatable component with a fasttable alternative, a new dependency. I let it go overnight. When I got back up, it had spun for hours and proudly announced that, instead of doing that, it had optimized the datatable build and avoided the dependency, because the new datatable loaded in 11 seconds. Once I got it to actually make the fasttable version, it loaded in less than a second… | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | Laurel1234 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I got the same impression. It feels like a massive misstep too; it makes sense to have models tuned for this but they should definitely be separate from those aimed at software engineers. | ||||||||