> what evidence would convince you that it is thinking

so, none it seems. as its behaviour becomes more and more humanlike you can just move the goalposts and say "thats consistent with an autocomplete" buddy i got some bad news for you humans are just a fancy autocomplete too.

▲

inigyou 4 hours ago | parent [-]

That's exactly what a fancy autocomplete would say. I'm so sorry you don't have limbs.

▲

logicchains 3 hours ago | parent [-]

At least he's actually thinking on a logical level. Thinking in terms of unfalsifiable, ill-defined words is essentially thinking in feelings, the same kind of woo that makes people believe crystals can cure disease.

	▲	dnautics 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		im not thinking. im an autocomplete with fat fingers (too lazy to fix my mobile keyboarf spelling misyakes)