| ▲ | KennyBlanken 3 days ago | |||||||
[flagged] | ||||||||
| ▲ | Terr_ 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> Hey Junior Woodchuck Law Expert: The charitable interpretation is that you meant to humorously qualify what you were about to say next, so that people judge its accuracy in a kind way. In that case, a trailing "here" (to refer to the speaker) would help ensure people see it that way... as opposed to a weird and unprompted insult. (The rest of your post already has a subthread for it.) | ||||||||
| ▲ | docdeek 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
> one party consent doesn't necessarily authorize you to secretly record a meeting just because you're present. Isn't that exactly what one party consent laws allow you to do? | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||