| ▲ | runako 5 hours ago | |
> last pre-GFC Bush II > last pre-Covid Trump I Sure, if you exclude the big increases, you can draw different conclusions. GFC was not an exogenous shock, and even if it was, a) Bush was in office setting policy the prior 6 years and b) the specific response was not preordained (for ex: it is not part of the Constitution that rich people must pay lower tax rates than they did in 1982, that invariant is a policy choice). | ||
| ▲ | twoodfin 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Sure, but absent the GFC, Bush-era tax rates + spending choices pushed the deficit to a low % of GDP we’d kill for right now. Do you think lower high-income marginal rates caused the GFC? | ||