| ▲ | dimbletimbers 2 hours ago | |
I think a majority of my friends are teachers and this could not be further opposite their sentiments. They feel strongly that it’s dishonest, nearly akin to plagiarism to use AI output in lesson plans. They don’t use it for grading or data analysis b/c of privacy concerns. They mostly complain that the kids are using it for homework, which makes it hard to grade both because it’s too uniform and because there’s no good faith effort going into the work which makes reading it unrewarding. And the consensus is that test scores are down b/c they’re offloading normal course work to AI. It’s basically the bane of their existence. The idea that it’s actually better for diversity feels like a wild reach, almost a canned talking point. | ||
| ▲ | idiotsecant 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Lol ok tons of teachers use LLMs to make material. The plural of anecdote is not data, but in this case it's close. | ||