| ▲ | marginalia_nu 5 hours ago | |||||||
> It's the great irony of digital media. Copying data is accurate to the bit and is preserved "as-is", but in practice, it requires someone to maintain servers, to care about it. To separate out what is worth preserving. This is a bit idealized. In practice copying data is not quite accurate (especially in bulk) and bit-rot is a very real phenomenon, both in flight and in storage. You sometimes encounter it when dealing with files from the early '00s, it's very common to discover a few of them are corrupt, even if they've only ever been copied between harddrives. | ||||||||
| ▲ | tekne 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Content-addressed storage and error correcting codes mean that one can make bitrot astronomically unlikely with honestly minimal infra investment. It's copyright that causes anything to disappear from the web IMO -- torrents never die. EDIT: I am aware that unseeded torrents do in fact die. But it really doesn't take much to seed a whole hard drive's worth of rarely requested data -- this also detects bitrot and so corrects errors automatically if you're not the only copy. If you are, there's ECC, as well as making another copy. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||