If we were to focus on principle over scale, could we not name many others involved in similar practices, from each 'side' and in between the shitstick? And should we not do so?

In a way, it seems somewhat signaling that the precedent was long set, and unspoken rules always effectively 'allowed' it, so here I am, just being more candid about it than stale O..ld Windows have previously encouraged.

Let's not focus on principle over scale, particularly because scotus declared the rules are completely different for the executive.

Others engaged in similar practices do get named. They don't need to be named here.