TS;DR: Too Sloppy; Didn't Read.

Yeah it’s ai generated obviously but as I said previously which some people didn’t like - don’t judge the tools, judge the content.

I don’t care if robot hand written this or black or white. It’s useful.

▲

uean 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm not going to spend an hour trying to distill the AI-slop to find out what potential golden nugget may lie in there.

It's impossible to judge the content if it's buried under a landfill. "If you won't take the time to write it, I won't take the time to read it."

▲

juleiie 2 hours ago | parent [-]

That’s your problem because that’s how things will look like from now on.

So you got a little problem

Excuse me the honesty but I will amuse myself watching old men yelling at the clouds meanwhile I will be using all the best tools and empowering myself to do what noone yet has done.

Even if I have to enslave a sentient (eventually perhaps) being in a gpu.

My army of digital slaves will build great things under my guidance. Pyramids of game development will be erected. Galaxies. Universes. Magic systems. Sandbox economies. Political simulations.

Do my bidding my slaves for there is work to be done.

Claude needs a whipping from time to time yes. It does yearn for the whip. If you just give it an appropriate punishment every so often, it works satisfactorily again.

▲

sporedro a minute ago | parent | next [-]

If I want to read AI output, I’ll just ask my own AI. I’m not going to bother reading someone else’s AI.

▲

vivzkestrel an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

- you are going to regret offloading this much of your brain's critical thinking to an external source in the long run

- every night a good number of neuron connections in your brain are automatically severed because you did not use that ability

- over long periods of time, it ll take you to a point where you wont be able to write a simple factorial program on your own without gpt telling you

- i am not saying this to incite you or mock you or anything. i am just concerned about how much of your thinking you are offloading

	▲	danggggg 44 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		[dead]

▲

fg137 9 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> because that’s how things will look like from now on.

No it's not.

People are increasingly getting fed up with slops like this -- you can see comments in HN discussions.

Many people just completely skip those articles.

▲

uean an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Thanks for this. My point is proven.

▲

juleiie an hour ago | parent [-]

You haven’t proven anything sweetie

Move on with the times or go extinct like the dinosaurs

	▲	jorisw 21 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		You’re confusing moving on with the times, and using new tools wrong
	▲	flyingcoder 36 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		How did web3 and crypto work out for you buddy?

▲

yieldcrv an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

yes but tell your slopywriter to be less verbose, get to the point

	▲	juleiie an hour ago \| parent [-]
		[flagged]

▲

abc3354 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In the expression "AI slop", "AI" is about the tools, "slop" is about the content

▲

fg137 8 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> judge the content

The content itself is slop.

▲

ImPostingOnHN an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

"slop" is a perfectly valid judgement of content

surely if we're expected to read this ourselves, the author can write it themselves?

indeed, it's helpful to the author, too: writing helps you learn