The underlying idea is that AI capabilities will become so advanced that only AI will enable us to monitor/correct/understand behavior. Obviously this is not without issue and I don't want to try to defend their position right now. But that's what they mean

▲

hn_throwaway_99 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That first sentence of yours explains exactly why it is so ridiculous. If only AI can understand it, how is there any assurance that AI will "correct" it's behavior that is aligned with what humans presumably want.

▲

VeninVidiaVicii 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

But also what is the evidence that something only AI can understand even “matters” or makes sense? I’m increasingly convinced commercial AI is exploiting our logical blind spot to be spoken to authoritatively.

▲

skybrian 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It’s not hard to get LLM’s to inform on each other. They don’t really do loyalty.

	▲	vhantz 31 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It's a language model. It generates text.

▲

esafak 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Being less smart gives no assurance that it will be aligned. At least you consider it a problem so we're on the same page!

▲

a2ff6eeb0 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You just described the end of humans making decisions about their future.

▲

MontagFTB 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think I’ve seen that movie.

▲

kakugawa 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"Advanced" can just mean that agents perform actions at a high enough velocity that a human operator can't reasonably review it. i.e. what is already possible today.