Yes, obviously, you own the output. Training on those outputs is a violation of the service agreement, and that’s separate from who owns the outputs.

▲

sourdecor 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

But LLMs are being trained on GitHub libraries that leveraged Claude?

▲

Hamuko 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I hope I see the day I start seeing AI companies suing other AI companies for training their models on GitHub repositories that were written using the AI companies' models. If Anthropic says that I can't train using Claude's output, then surely OpenAI can't train on a repository that's 100% vibecoded with Claude.

▲

riffraff 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I think they care about the reasoning traces and such being used for training, not the effectively final output.

▲

Hamuko 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Are they even giving out the reasoning these days?

	▲	thevinter 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1vlhteb/resear...

▲

j45 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Transferring actual and complete ownership of the output doesn’t allow any further interpretations of the use of it.

That sentence seems to be in a blurry line between outright “ownership” and licensing.

This type of explanation leans towards the reality being you don’t own the outputs from Claude.

This kind of an explanation is like trying to be half pregnant.

	▲	smallerize 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The only penalty here is being banned for a ToS violation. Maybe they could sue for fraud or something? That doesn't change who owns the data.