Corollary: If you can't use the output to train, then you don't own them.

rubslopes 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Apparently, they use "own" in the same misleading way that digital media providers use "buy", but later remove the purchased content from my library.

It's named "yours" at the time of payment, but actually only a license to use under certain conditions.

j45 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yup, either you own it, or you don’t own it and ownership is being redefined as a quasi license.

	▲	grumbelbart2 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Nobody "owns" it for the most part. Most LLM output can not be copyrighted, because there is not enough human essence in it. Meaning that it is public domain the moment it is produced. There might be a few exceptions, if you really guided your model in a certain particular way, but that is rare. What /could/ be is that you violate their ToS. If that ToS is valid and legally and practically enforceable is a different question and will depend a lot on your jurisdiction.