| ▲ | areoform 17 hours ago | |||||||
A mac studio with 96GB unified memory costs, $5,299.00.https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/mac-studio/m3-ultra-chip-... LLMs can re-write and cross-translate software really well. Why does CUDA still have a $11k price premium? | ||||||||
| ▲ | xyzzy123 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
You can get 5-10x the perf out of the blackwell under the right workloads. It has faster VRAM (> 2x) and can do a lot more matmuls (>> 10x). They're both good value (or crazy expensive) depending on how you look at it. It depends how you price the ability to run a particular model at all, vs run the model quickly and serve several parallel streams. | ||||||||
| ▲ | swiftcoder 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
The Blackwell is going to be a lot faster for the same memory capacity than a Mac Studio, surely? | ||||||||
| ▲ | pjmlp 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Because people still pay for them, and mac studios aren't usable on server racks, as classical UNIX variants. Maybe Apple should bring OS X Server back, with a rack like drawer. CUDA ecosystem is more than running PyTorch. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | MiroslavPokorny 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Because a lot of people are buying them at that price. | ||||||||
| ▲ | josh-wrale 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Memory bandwidth, ecosystem compatibility, compute power. | ||||||||
| ▲ | angoragoats 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
As others have stated, the Blackwell runs circles around the Mac performance-wise. I haven’t run the numbers for this specific comparison, but in some cases the nvidia solution is also more efficient (tokens/W). Some people are willing to pay that premium for the above, just like they’d pay more for a 4-door sedan from BMW as compared to a Toyota Corolla. | ||||||||
| ▲ | JackSlateur 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Is that was true, claude would be written in Rust; | ||||||||