They are more prevalent than you think, especially in places like ports and airports. But part of the problem is they are typically expensive for anything more sophisticated than a basic Geiger counter, like most commercial offerings start at $5k and can very quickly go into the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars per unit. And they require a lot of training to use effectively.

At least in the US there is also a pretty substantial network of teams and equipment for providing radiological technical support in an emergency. Examples of this are DoE RAP and the USNG CST. Now part of the motivation for this work was that a lot of the techniques for actually doing a search are fairly primitive, but there is a major support network with most of the tools and skills ready to go 24/7. It tends to all be very low key and fly under the radar, mostly because even a hint of one of these teams being deployed tends to cause a panic.

▲

copperx an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I was born in the city where this happened, right on the US border: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ciudad_Ju%C3%A1rez_cobalt-60_c...

In fact, the house down the street to my parents' was torn down and rebuilt in the 80s because it had contaminated rebar.

When I was a kid, a neighbor, who is a civil engineer had a Geiger counter and went through the neighborhood and said he found nothing abnormal.

However, there is a cluster of cancer cases of people in the neighborhood of all kinds (breast, testicular, melanoma, liver, and kidney, of which my mother died of), including two friends who still lived there, and were diagnosed in their early 30s. Could be just bad luck, but I still wonder. My father still lives there.

I guess I should at least skim your dissertation, but is there a device that could be employed to sweep the neighborhood?

	▲	gh02t an hour ago \| parent [-]
		The cheapest worthwhile detectors out there are the Radiacode ones. They are excellent for what they are, but they run around $300. Cheaper Geiger counters are unfortunately kinda useless, at least for this. It's also not particularly easy to know what you're looking at and how to interpret it even with a good detector, unfortunately I'm not sure how much luck you'd have so don't waste $300.

▲

wildzzz 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

When doing heavy ion testing for space flight hardware, there's a potential for the hardware to be a little hot after a full day of testing. Not really dangerous but hot enough that you need to let it sit for a day. At one facility I went to, the physicists there said in the past a group didn't let their hardware cool off and it alerted radiation detectors in the Lincoln Tunnel, NYC.