| ▲ | thataccount 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Poster is drinking the "Breen Cola". I don't find that prizes, especially modern ones awarded for literature, equate to "stuff worth reading". In most cases, something worth reading is going to typically be 70-80 years old—back when people had to use their imaginations and more extensive vocabulary that wasn't being doused and invaded by vile AI swill. The same thing is often true of movies in that the older ones are more well-crafted and better paced and carry messages still relevant now. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | arjie 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Hugo Award nominees are all pretty good. Winning isn't any more significant than getting shortlisted. For a short while I thought it was dropping in quality but a discussion here led to my changing my mind: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48929545 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||