Depends on project complexity. For one of my more complex projects, I exclusively use sol-high ... nothing below that works correctly.

For this however, a comparatively much simpler task, tarra-high works fine.

▲

Foobar8568 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Right now, sol-xhigh is my favorite model. I feel that Opus 5 is dumber than 4.8. Fable is too expensive to do anything (limit of $50, started a prompt at $25, ended up at $75, is bullshit, but at least it's "free credits").

DeepSeek is okay for random API-based stuff, as it's cheap.

Local open models running on a 5090 are hit or miss. I feel that most GGUFs/quants are awful...

▲

ericfr11 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I am still on Opus 4.8, with a custom built harness and it works very well even on multi-repos, across stack, deep changes. I also have a very solid test suite which is helping the coding agent a lot

▲

miohtama 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Opus 5 degrades to word salad.

I wonder if it is because of watermarking.

	▲	SwellJoe 19 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Opus 5 doesn't really even speak coherent English. I'm not sure what's going on, but it can't explain anything. It still does an excellent job with code and writing tests and code review and creating and completing a plan, and it seems to be able to understand English instructions, but it sure as hell can't explain what it did or how to use the code it wrote. That was true before they announced the watermarking, I'd already started to back off of using Opus as much because I like to understand what the model is doing and have it write documentation I can use to reproduce its results, but maybe watermarking was already in there unannounced.