| ▲ | Gecko4072 6 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
So not worth it over flash? Even at ~7x the size it isn't worth the price hike. Flash may be a monster of a model due to all the RL it received from free usage everywhere. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | networked 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I haven't tried DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 yet. Recent experience tells me that larger models are worth it in non-obvious ways. MiMo-V2.5-Pro solved problems that DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 couldn't solve for me: for example, adding a live counter for elided reasoning lines to a terminal-based coding harness. You wouldn't be able to tell from the scores on their respective Artifical Analysis page (https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/mimo-v2-5-pro, https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/deepseek-v4-flash). I like the DeepSeek V4 models, though. They critiqued my engineering decisions better than MiMo, and they seem to have a distinct aesthetic in the SVGs they write. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | saaga 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yea that's what I was thinking. Flash is nuts. I find I have to be a more precise and specific with it but damn. It's crossed a threshold of production grade coding for sure. I was running a session over a couple days and it didnt cross a dollar lol. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | npn 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I still believe this is not the full potential of pro models. I expect they will release another checkpoint later this year. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | k__ 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I tried the previous Pro model and in the end it was 50% more expensive than the previous Flash. Wasn't worth it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | eli 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opus 5 medium to Opus 5 max is only 3 points, if that puts it in context | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||