| ▲ | Glaciers on the Climate Dashboard(climate.metoffice.cloud) |
| 93 points by mooreds 6 hours ago | 18 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | sys32768 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| George Bird Grinnell, the "Father of Glacier National Park", made a final visit to his namesake Grinnell glacier in 1926 and then wrote in his diary [1]: >"the glacier is melting very fast and the amount of water coming from it is great. All these glaciers are receding rapidly and after a time will disappear." [1] = https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/repeat-photos-of-grinnell-g... |
| |
| ▲ | oijkuij 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's important to also note, as explained in the article:
>"Grinnell was witnessing the glacier react to a relatively natural change in the climate. The Little Ice Age, which was a cold period when the park’s current glaciers were at their largest, ended in the late 1800s as the climate started warming. The melting of the park’s glaciers in the late 1800s, was a mostly natural reaction to the end of the Little Ice Age." The quote, without context, implied to me that he had an understanding of anthropogenic climate change a century ago. While there were people[1] at that time who did theorize this was happening, I don't think that's what Grinnell was implying in his diary. It's also the case that the amount of melting then pales in comparison to the amount occurring today - so I'm not attempting to say that what we see today may be the continuing of a natural climate fluctuation. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nils_Gustaf_Ekholm | |
| ▲ | krat0sprakhar 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I was at Glacier Bay National Park just last week (https://photos.prakhar.me/alaska) and it was just depressing to hear from the park rangers on how far the glaciers have receded. Really grateful to have been able to witness them in person but it is sad to see what we've done to this planet. | | |
| ▲ | daemonologist 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The Glacial National Park referenced by GP is in Montana; you were perhaps at Glacier Bay National Park. Regardless, some beautiful photos, thanks for sharing | |
| ▲ | vinaigrette 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't know you but I doubt you're largely responsible for the climate crisis. What I mean is that the "we" is a unsteerable concept. As such, I don't consider myself responsible. I do as much as my limited power lets me (also i guess I could resort myself to more potent ways of political expression). People that have power are responsible. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nehal3m 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The graph for cumulative glacier mass balance is quite sobering. The loss seems to be accelerating as well. This stuff is so depressing. |
| |
| ▲ | distortionfield 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I’ll never forgive the US for pulling out of the Paris accords after we had gotten China to come to the table. That was our moment to get a real grip on this problem and we blew it. It’ll never come back, I’m convinced. | | |
| ▲ | fma 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Can we be more specific and say it was Trump who pulled the US out of the Paris Accord, twice. | | |
| ▲ | Manfrednotfunny 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It was the american people who voted in Trump twice! So no. | | |
| ▲ | zingar an hour ago | parent [-] | | Well, a tiny fraction less than half the American people, at least the first time? | | |
| ▲ | mandolingual 22 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | All those who voted for him and all those who didn't vote against him are equally complicit | |
| ▲ | shoo 13 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | In 2016 Trump got 46.1% of the popular vote vs Hillary Clinton's 48.2%. Expressed as fractions of the total US population in 2016: - about 28.5% of the population was not eligible to vote (due to age or other reasons)
- about 31.6% of the population was eligible to vote but did not vote for either candidate
- about 20.4% of the population voted for Hillary Clinton
- about 19.5% of the population voted for Trump
If approx 1 in 5 is 'tiny' then support for the alternative was also 'tiny'. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | stevenwoo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The chase on a glacier in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley would be a lot less dramatic today, Mer de Glace, https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20251106-the-sea-of-ice-t... |
|
| ▲ | koops 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They should mention thermal expansion, which is also a major driver of sea-level rise. |
|
| ▲ | Invictus0 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's like they purposefully chose the most confusing Y axis. I was at the Pasterze glacier in Austria a few months ago. It is little more than a puddle now. https://x.com/subfossilguy/status/1942267429196910753/photo/... |
|
| ▲ | vixen99 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://nmaffe.github.io/iceboost_webapp/ is an app for estimating glacier ice thickness using a machine-learning model. 'ICEBOOST v2.0 viewer' |
|
| ▲ | tonymet an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I recently visited Illecillewaet Glacier in Glacier NP , BC and most of the recession occurred prior to 1930 . Naturally the remnant continued to recede after that. And the recession started before 1880 When you draw short term graphs, of course those trends will appear worrisome. |
| |
