I imagine Meta and folks wearing these glasses would object to webcam like behavior where it tells you with a LED that it's consuming the video feed. Could be same for taking a picture.

But then probably fewer people would buy them.

▲

eqvinox an hour ago | parent [-]

These glasses have a LED. I haven't seen it for real, but I've heard it's not discernible at daylight.

Even so, it might still run afoul of German law. The German radio directive specifically forbids recording devices made to blend in and be surreptitious. The LED would have to be extremely obvious and hard to tamper with.

(It's not even a privacy directive; you're just not allowed to sell devices like that. Baby monitors have run afoul it.)

[German] https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Fachthemen/Datenportal/V...

Blue is "online offers actioned/removed", orange is "legal proceedings initiated against vendors & sellers". That's more than 7 legal actions per day in 2024.

▲

waltbosz 38 minutes ago | parent [-]

The LEDs can be disabled with a hardware mod.

https://thenewthings.com/p/i-paid-someone-to-hack-my-meta-gl...

	▲	eqvinox 35 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		That's not an argument in this (legal) case since the regulation applies at the time the device is sold. (It just means the applicable law is another one, i.e. the one against recording in secret, which applies regardless of what the recording device looks like.) [Ed.: it could still be considered a design/manufacturing defect, I guess. It certainly would fail if it were intentionally made such that the LED is trivially disabled. The courts may have to decide if this is in the grey zone.]