| ▲ | benatkin 8 hours ago | |||||||
Counter-example: Alphabet doesn't have alphabet.com | ||||||||
| ▲ | CodesInChaos 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
They have google.com, which is the brand they use towards customers. The Alphabet brand is little more than a stock ticker. | ||||||||
| ▲ | newleaf 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
They use abc.xyz though, which is fun at least. | ||||||||
| ▲ | SJMG 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
They have abc.xyz | ||||||||
| ▲ | philipwhiuk 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Counter-counter point: It's not really used in branding either by any of the child companies. So they don't need it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | rvz 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Who ever has alphabet.com will be able to sell it for 7 figures anyway, which is the point. | ||||||||
| ||||||||