| ▲ | duxup 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't understand why a regular patrol officer would / should even have access to something like this without some level of extra authorization. They're not detectives running an open investigation ... In this case this officer was searching numerous networks over and over again, that alone should trigger some metrics that raise the question "uh ... why?" | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pudgywalsh an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
You never worked for a startup where the CEO demanded administrator rights to everything just because he's CEO? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | newsomix9xl 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacheco has been one of the top users of the Flock system this year, according to data The Light previously obtained from the city. The most common reason inputted since April for her searches has been “traffic infraction.” | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | none2585 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Because no one important cares and no one will do anything about it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nickthegreek 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
How else could they have arrested that wisconsin guy for driving to michigan to purchase cannabis? You know, apparently a totally valid use for such technology.. | |||||||||||||||||||||||