>On July 17, the CDC told Americans in no uncertain terms, “Do not eat shredded iceberg lettuce served at Taco Bell locations in Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and West Virginia.” The FDA, meanwhile, noted that Walmart’s Marketside brand was part of the recall, but it did not indicate that it constituted the bulk of the recall.

>It’s unclear why Taylor Farms did not publicly reveal that the majority of the recalled lettuce had been shipped to Walmart stores while Americans were focusing on Taco Bell locations.

>Taylor Farms has drawn scrutiny for its ties to the Trump administration and reluctance to provide information amid the outbreak [...] has refused to clearly report how much tainted lettuce it recalled and where all of it had been shipped.

Yes, it raises questions.

To put a slightly finer point on it, the article lists at least two questions, prefaced with "unclear why" and "unclear where" respectively.

Oh, sure, I guess grammatically they are technically statements that some information is missing... but I hope any English-speaker can tell that the subtext is a demand for more information. (e.g. "The public deserves to know why the chicken crossed the road.")

Fair enough to all of that; even though I did read TFA, I guess the (original, crappy) headline threw me off because it seemed like it was implying that Taco Bell should have received more than 2.5% of the affected lettuce, and I was like "Well obviously Taco Bell is just one of many businesses in the supply chain, that seems like an accurate amount to me."

Which is the wrong angle on my part, but leads to the same point about it being dubious to throw Taco Bell under the bus here.