These policies seem to be often evolving lately in many projects, but I believe OpenBSD (the project OpenSSH is contained inside) is currently skeptical of AI generated code contributions at this point in time.

For example, I found this on a Google search, here is a thread from Theo, the project leader, about LLM output and copyright, where he says they can't accept it into the tree on copyright grounds. https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=177425035627562&w=2

Elsewhere in the thread he implies using it for a code review tool is ok

▲

minimaltom 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Idk if its accurate to rote project the policies of OpenBSD to OpenSSH, yes technically its a subproject but in practice stewardship and thus effective policy is pretty much all damien.

	▲	asveikau an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		If they disagreed about something so fundamental as the attribution of copyright, it would be a serious schism, from my outside perspective it seems along the lines of something that would lead to a fork or separation between the projects. I also just read more context on the thread and it seems like Damien Miller is in there saying much the same thing as Theo. He wrote: > ... use of AI-written code now [will] expose us to legal risk.
	▲	2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]