| ▲ | threethirtytwo 11 hours ago | |||||||
I have an agent read most of the code as well. The agent explains things to me in plain english. The default sentiment is humans should read code it's more progressive and a leap of faith to start giving that up. Obviously, I get why you feel humans still reading code is important, but if you look at the progress of AI for the past couple of years, that gap is closing. The trendlines speak of a future where it becomes less and less important. This was exactly what happened with writing code. Now most people don't write code. | ||||||||
| ▲ | eliasson 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> Now most people don't write code. I use LLM daily to write code for and "with" me, I also write code without LLM. Most people I come across mix it up. A few do it all by hand, and equally few all by LLM I would say. Is that just in my corner of the world? | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | throwitaway222 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I have a few utility go codebases that I simply do not read at all - but it's internal tooling so there's literally no point in reading it when the LLM can modify it in seconds to do new things. | ||||||||
| ▲ | simonw 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I don't read all of the code produced by my agents any more, but I like to reserve the ability to do so if I run into a particularly confusing bug, or for any code that's security adjacent. | ||||||||
| ||||||||