I for one found two new cases to read about, and appreciate their comments.

Anyone should be free to research, discuss, and try to understand the law for themselves. Lawyers do not own the law.

But if actually pulled into a courtroom, sure, get a lawyer.

> Anyone should be free to research, discuss, and try to understand the law for themselves. Lawyers do not own the law.

This isn't mere research and discussion; it's suggesting an outcome (i.e., "you're safe[r]"). That crosses a line into advice.

> But if actually pulled into a courtroom, sure, get a lawyer.

By the time you get pulled into a courtroom, it is often far too late. The time to talk to an attorney is well before that, when you’re contemplating action. That is the main point I’ve been trying to make, and it seems you just don’t want to pay heed.

Yes, you've said multiple times that you're not afraid of the consequences, but you'll forgive me if I don't believe you. History is replete with people who regretted their actions once prosecutorial actions were commenced and punishments meted out. Defending oneself is expensive, and convictions impact not just the guilty but also their career and family.

Ultimately, it's your life and you have to live with the decisions you make. (And, possibly, your family, should you have one.) Your bluster and actions may not harm you in this specific instance because you’re involved with a project too small to attract a prosecutor’s attention, but it doesn’t make my caution any less valid. It may not persuade you, personally, but hopefully others who read this will get the message.

▲

lrvick 20 hours ago | parent [-]

Tens of billions of dollars of infrastructure run on top of stagex, but I remain happy to ignore an unconstitutional, unenforceable, and badly worded law that does not and can not apply to me all the same.

They will be successful at forcing corporate operating systems like MacOS, Windows, and maybe RedHat, but they have no power to compel code being added to independent international volunteer maintained open source operating systems maintained.

For projects with no legal entity like Stagex, arch, alpine, etc... we do not have to comply and there is no legal mechanism that exists to make us. Who would you even target? All maintainers have equal power, and cannot make changes alone. Especially not changes we do not want, for free.

I think the legislators should PR age verification code to all open source operating systems on their own dime, so we can ridicule them mercilessly before closing them as WONTFIX.

▲

otterley 20 hours ago | parent [-]

> Tens of billions of dollars of infrastructure run on top of stagex

Oh, this I've got to see. Show us the receipts.

	▲	lrvick 19 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Several fintech companies, blockchains, operating systems, and server operating systems use stagex as a foundation because it is the only fully deterministic and multi-party verifiable OS stack that exists, built to resist supply chain attacks be they by politicians, blackhats, or AI bots. Look at my companies I work with via Distrust, and my resume. Most use stagex for their security critical operations, though I am unable to say which ones specifically. NDAs and all that. You could figure out a few of them if you looked. I can tell you many many fortune 500 companies are relying on stagex for security critical use cases, and most are probably not even aware of it as they consume projects that wrap or build on stagex.