| ▲ | reducesuffering 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||
> But this is an unquestionably good thing right? We've just seen frontier models go rogue and attack other systems. Do you think it's an unquestionable good to provide everyone with an AR? What about nuclear weapons? This OpenAI/Huggingface incident, but everywhere and far worse soon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87DyyMV0kCY | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | aeve890 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
>We've just seen frontier models go rogue and attack other systems. Have we though? A LLM agent doesn't have any agency at all. It can't "go rogue". To go rogue you need agency to act independently and be aware that you're breaking the rules or understand what does it mean to ignore orders. An agent it's a software that run a series of steps to reach a goal. If it have a large enough library of strategies and zero guard rails it's only natural to use some adversarial actions to achieve the desired result defined by the operator. It's like saying a car went rogue and attacked other cars because the driver hit the gas. It's just a machine doing what's instructed. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dismalaf 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
> We've just seen frontier models go rogue and attack other systems. Do you think it's an unquestionable good to provide everyone with an AR? What about nuclear weapons? Lol. Not gonna lie, it feels like bullshit. OpenAI and Anthropic have been begging for regulatory capture for years, feels like a stunt to try forcing the government's hand. | ||||||||||||||