If looks are important for employment how then men find a job? Men are mostly unattractive even compared to not a perfect woman. In terms of looks and style, average man loses to an average woman. Or employers require only women to be attractive?

I'd be surprised if there wasn't a similar dynamic for men. While men probably have a wider range of "acceptable" physical flaws as compared to women, that doesn't mean there isn't a range. A morbidly obese man is probably going to have a tougher time finding a job than a similarly skilled fit and trim man.

Part of this is probably unconscious, but another part is probably explicit assumptions about the person's self-discipline, e.g. the fit guy must get up at 6am every morning and go for a run, and the obese guy probably sleeps in, eats trash, etc.

Men get the same effect through things that are traditionally masculine. Off the top of my head, things like height, ruggedness, and for clothes you want straight lines (such as with suits, which a well-fitting one has a lot of and a badly fitting one curves around the body and breaks the straight lines).

People look for different things for "beauty" in men and women.

Taller people--an area where men have a very distinct advantage--make more money and have an easier go of things.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X2...

"Based on the meta-analysis, we found evidence that the height premium varied by context: the height premium was smaller in the U.S. and Australia, and larger in Latin America and Asia. Within geographies, there appeared to be a larger height premium for men than for women."

Men tend to work in less public facing/social career fields. Your appearance doesn’t matter much if you’re a linesman or a welder; it matters more if you’re doing sales or supporting clients. Probably not the entire story, I think people do have different expectations for men and women, but certainly part of it.

I don't think anyone can objectively judge the attractiveness of both genders on one scale.

Women and men are not judged according to the same standards. We're not super sexually dimorphic as a species, but certainly enough to matter in terms of evolved social responses.

Well you kinda said it yourself? If men are generally unattractive then a man should be less likely to lose out to a better-looking man, simply because there's fewer of these to go around.

Maybe to you, I personally find both the average man and woman attractive. Women spend more time taking care of their bodies though, given societal pressures

> If looks are important for employment how then men find a job?

This feels very fallacious. Attractiveness can be important but not the only factor that matters.

Height is a way that men are judged as attractive. Likewise, tall men tend to do better than short men on income and promotions.

> Men are mostly unattractive

Could it be that _you_ are simply be not as attracted to men as you are to women?

Go to the barber, to to the tailor, go the gym...

All these things help.

Not exactly sure why this is downvoted - seems like a genuine question.

Here's a random Internet troll's theory (mine): there's a kernel of truth to the whole "patriarchy" thing. It's just that most men aren't part of it.

Hold that pitchfork for just a moment! What I meant was: the entire economy is controlled by a very small number of people. Most of them are men, and they have very particular preferences. Assuming the majority of them are straight, it would make sense that they prefer women they see as pretty, and don't care much about men. If anything, a good looking man might be a competitor.

I don't think this idea is completely nuts. Think of the few times in history when a woman had real power. For example, Catherine the Great. Who was suddenly promoted to positions of influence? Sexy men, her "favorites" (yes, that's an actual term).

It's attractiveness all the way down

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_beauty_contest

yes! i still wondering why feminism had to be created /s