Without detracting from anything you said, all I meant is that a lot of people make the argument of "we can't test it" when it's likely that the "can't" is purely a technological limitation. If those people knew the definition of falsifiability as stated on Wikipedia, they wouldn't make such a stupid argument.

That's a fair point, I'm not even sure I was even arguing against your comment. Mostly just pointing out stuff I thought was relevant.