| ▲ | benrutter an hour ago | |
I like that theory, if I was going to counter it though, I'd say that I'm not sure those features match what language users talk about. For instance: - C: Users often praise the simplicity of the language - C++: Users often praise (not always praise?) the large feature set for a low level language - Python: Folks talk a lot about "batteries included". Although in all honesty, I think having good interaction with other low-level languages is Python's secret feature. - Java: Really leans in hard to object oriented programming - JavaScript: Haha, you have to use it! Not sure I'm really disagreeing with you though, but I think Java promoted its portability much more than it's ever been used (obviously there are cases like Spark which uses the JVM portability). | ||