Japanese court overturns Red RAW video patent

Thank god. The actual patent (roughly; I researched it myself, but a few years ago so memory fuzzy) involves compressing frames/video before debayering which makes the streams more easily compressible; instead of after debayering, and as part of a camera (internal RAW). Yeah.

	▲	rasz 13 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Wasnt the patent pretty much "and then I dump raw sensor data to a JPEG2000 codec"?

▲

Wistar 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In the past 15 years, I have purchased five Lumix cameras including the new L10 (which I have yet to receive). I like their cameras a lot. The dedication to pursue this battle is another reason I am certain to buy more.

▲

wmf an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is a terrible patent (it's basically a list of features) and unfortunately Red was able to milk it for almost 20 years.

▲

grokcodec 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've been waiting for this result for a long time - great news!!

▲

dabinat 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> One possibility the abolition of the license fees reportedly due to Red from users of Apple’s ProRes RAW codec.

This would be great but I’m not going to hold my breath.

▲

looksjjhg 33 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Wow that’s big!