| ▲ | e2le 3 hours ago |
| What is the weather app doing that it requires 100MB? For such a simple application, that seems excessive. |
|
| ▲ | kevincox 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Mostly rendering. A bunch of images, text, UI elements. On a modern high resolution display it adds up quite quickly. You can surely cut it down a bit, but 100MB isn't absurd. |
| |
| ▲ | Dylan16807 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | If I full-screen it in high enough resolution it can be excused for using 100MB temporarily. The window in the article wasn't very big. At most it would have about 10MB of framebuffer, and the images on display would fit into 1MB uncompressed. We can't excuse typical program waste with screen sizes. Especially when you can switch to 1080p or 720p and watch them still use massive amounts of memory. | |
| ▲ | charleslmunger 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | A weather widget using 8 bit color plus alpha on a 4k display show three full size images in 100mb. But I suspect that's not the ux we're talking about here, and a widget style system has no excuse. | | |
| ▲ | galad87 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Apple's Weather app has an animated background, glassy views, and nice animations like water droplets on the glassy views when it's raining. So rendering all that on a 4k or more display at 10bit depth is going to consume a bit of RAM. However I guess it can surely be improved to make it consume less RAM. | |
| ▲ | satvikpendem 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | https://wttr.in/ shows it's very possible. | |
| ▲ | anthk 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Vector icons. It can be fit under 50MBs. | | |
| ▲ | pixelesque 44 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Those still have to be rasterised to a pixel-based frame buffer at render/compositing time. |
| |
| ▲ | useasvg 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Use an svg. Or render everything using css, 100mb is someone not trying. 1gb is absurd abuse that only domestic violence victims put up with. | | |
| |
| ▲ | puzzleincomplet 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
|
| ▲ | cyberrock 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I think this depends on your location, because in some places you really want to view a radar map. "Rain in $CITY" is practically useless for me. Still, the (static?) map in the depicted app shouldn't take 1GB. |
