Since the other app is also heavily vibe-coded, it wouldn't make sense to kill your own, so I guess in reality this is questionable?

> While I had genuinely never seen DarkHours.app before yesterday

If only there were a way to share your own commits resulting from your own Claude sessions to verify whether it's true...

▲

satvikpendem 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Well if the other app was vibe coded I guess technically there was no copyright to it at all, ironic to talk about stealing in that case. I don't care about either party here so don't construe this comment as defending the author but I find the situation amusing with the current copyright laws.

▲

derdi 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Nobody mentioned copyrights or stealing in this thread.

▲

derdi 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Haha, excellent downvote, thanks. I stand corrected, one other person mentioned the word "copyright" in the time between me searching the discussion for that term, and then writing and posting.

There is some copyright discussion on one of the other submissions on this topic.

▲

satvikpendem 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes not in this thread but in the other submissions lots of people said the author was "stealing" the code but turns out the MIT original wasn't even eligible to be under that license as it has no copyright.

	▲	3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]