If you believe that AI does add to productivity gains, say equivalent to adding 10-20% employees, would you do anything differently than SAP?

▲ throwaway87543 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

If AI was actually making you more profitable, you wouldn't need to be cost cutting to avoid bankruptcy.

I'm not sure who is getting bankrupt?

	▲	PolygonSheep a day ago \| parent [-]
		No one, because they cut costs to avoid it.

▲ realusername 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

These are enough gains that you don't need to believe, they should be measurable

▲ simianwords 2 days ago | parent [-]

Not really. A company can work and do things without having to run RCTs to prove everything. The market itself is the RCT.

▲ realusername 2 days ago | parent [-]

If you doubt that you have gained something as high as 20% gains, it probably just means you got nothing.

And also, individual productivity isn't the same as organisation productivity, especially at such a large company.

	▲	andrekandre 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		`> gained something as high as 20% gains` all other things being held constant, i suppose it should be as easy as +20% profit rate? tho im not an executive so what do i know...