| ▲ | efficax 9 hours ago | |
well sure, but i mean realistically speaking, we cannot step debug an llm's output to find out what happened given the way we currently execute inference | ||
| ▲ | solenoid0937 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
> we cannot step debug an llm's output to find out what happened We absolutely can with mechanistic interpretability & companies like Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta, and Google do precisely this do debug their models. | ||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Depends on who "we" are, what you're talking about is a thing for inference providers doing batched inference and similar stuff. If you run one inference requests locally, you can actually step-by-step debug LLM output, just there is a ton of steps. But there is nothing "inherently random" or non-deterministic involved here, just optimization strategies for the large inference servers that makes it "impossible". | ||