Remix.run Logo
Tiberium 3 hours ago

(Not quoting the article directly due to HN's auto AI filters)

In "Common mistakes" this article first says not to add this record if you're not actually planning to sell the domain, then says that the record doesn't oblige anyone to do anything, that feels quite weird to me.

zinekeller 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This probably means that meeting the minimum price does not guarantee that you would be able to buy it due to other (probably opaque) criteria. For example, the seller might not want to sell to you/your company in particular, but is open to other people/companies.

reaperducer 22 minutes ago | parent [-]

Sounds good to me.

I have a particularly valuable domain name that would be perfect for a museum that later opened with the same name.

I'd love to sell or even give it to the museum, but all my offers have been ignored. I don't blame them, since everything on the Internet is a scam these days.

But I won't just put it for sale to the highest bidder. Then it'll end up with a squatter. I'd rather sit on it.

sokoloff 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I can have something for sale without an obligation to sell it (depending on offer terms, including price).

TZubiri 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

sokoloff 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> why is everyone such a p**** about

We can do a lot better than using non-inclusive language like this. There are better ways to express the underlying concept.