| ▲ | illright 18 hours ago | |||||||
That bit of text looks pretty unremarkable to me, what makes you think that no one talks or writes like this? | ||||||||
| ▲ | nerdsniper 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I see it plain as day as well FWIW. Not just that section, but most of the headings. The issue I have with it is that I can’t be sure whether a human actually double-checked anything. Writing in a “human” voice rather than robotic one serves as proof that someone actually bothered to really sign their name to the content. Otherwise I need to ground everything myself independently because the author’s reputation becomes meaningless if there’s no evidence they checked it. I don’t have time or energy to get ground truth on everything I read. That would be exhausting and impractical. | ||||||||
| ▲ | ande-mnoc 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I assume you don’t use Claude a lot? If you interact with it on a daily basis, it becomes your second instinct to identify its writing. Anthropic models talk like they are penalized by making sentences flow naturally. "The X I didn’t expect" is basically a mandatory section of a Claude-authored blog post at this point. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | x______________ 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
[dead] | ||||||||