Because AI cannot be trusted as a reliable source of information. Information is more trustworthy when it comes from from primary sources on the open web.

▲

aprdm 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Why not ? Can google be trusted ? Or facebook ? How do people have been accessing the internet for the last decade you reckon and how's this any different ?

	▲	lunar_mycroft an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Google (as it originally) existed wasn't a source of information, it was an index of it. You were trusting google as a source for {search_query}, you were trusting the links it gave as a source (based on your own evaluation). LLMs are fundamentally different, because you are trusting the software to actually generate the information in a truthful way. If you use google (sans AI), you're putting some trust in their page ranking algorithm. If you use it with AI, you're trusting the same algorithm (since that's how the model gets it's sources), but then you're trusting the model to evaluate the sources for credibility and extract the information you actually want.
	▲	antiterra 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		I routinely run into Claude Opus and Fable making basic mistakes like misunderstanding a simple negation, which would be on top of whatever reliability issues there are with a source. I think that means it is functionally very different.
	▲	giantrobot 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> Can google be trusted ? Or facebook ? No. Neither can be trusted as far as you can throw them. They're both incredibly invasive data brokers. Their customer facing products are just vehicles to show ads and Hoover up more PII and behavioral data on everyone.