> At first I was gonna say that if a person prefers the response of an A.I. to yours it is a reflection of your own lack of understanding, articulation, effective communication, etc.

I think that people in general need to be better at receiving information that isn't perfectly pitched to them. It is a useful life skill to be able to understand the substance of someone's argument, and to look past the superficial way that it is presented. Postel's law applied to human communication.

Someone can be very frustrated and angry, and it can be upsetting to hear how they're presenting their argument, but they can be correct.

Another person can also whisper everything you want to hear in your ears, but lead you down the wrong path.

In a well-functioning society, I would think our senior leadership would be experienced and actually good at doing this and it would be expected of them. Flipping that around and blaming the subordinate for how they've pitched the message is backwards and probably not societally healthy.

Agreed, we are definitely ******.