Are we ready to have a discussion about seeding the upper atmosphere with SO2 yet?

Maybe after double digit million death count.

Or just a rogue country that's being hit by the crisis more than others

glitchc an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Can we say for certain that doing so would not have an unintended side effect, given how complex the biodome is? If not, then likely no.

	▲	netsharc an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		One day the calculation is going to be "do nothing and cook ourselves to death" vs. "Put SO2 in the atmosphere and see what happens next". If the SO2 brings about destruction sooner, I'm of the camp that "well, we were destined for death anyway...".
	▲	lkbm 21 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I can understand a no answer from people who think climate change is no big deal, but it's kind of weird that people who think climate change will kill hundreds of millions -- possibly everyone -- say no on the grounds that it has risks. Possible unintended side effects is better than "everyone dies". Ten years ago, I was saying we should experiment with it on a small scale so that if it does become necessary, we're not shooting blind, but even then the doomers were opposed because of "risks". You know what else has risks? Unmitigated climate change!