| ▲ | aenis 38 minutes ago | ||||||||||||||||
I managed to lose around $300 in credits I had saved for some emergency /fast sessions the following way: switch to Fable. Work on the design. Downgrade to Opus for the build. If any of other parallel Opus session has /fast enabled it seems to enable it for the newly spawned session by default. Before I knew it, the $300 was gone. I think the bug is now solved, but it was rather unpleasant. I dont ever remember bugs that would drain my wallet - with claude code its just another Tuesday. Still love it. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | gnull 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Claude code is just pool quality. They don't make how this thing will behave clear to the user, or give control. They fail at anything that needs an abstraction or model, not just APIs and shell scripts glued together. And "just ask AI" seems to be the default fix. That vibe coding they brag about as if it was a good thing, it shows. Take their notation for describing permissions. The docs are not comprehensive, and in practice it doesn't quite work how they describe it. Or their management of sub-agents. I once lost a sub-agent, it finished and disappeared from UI. Apparently, you can't bring it back yourself: you have to ask the parent agent to do it for you. But the parent was Fable, and I ran out of credits, so I was locked out of using my opus sub-agent because of it. Or an even more grotesque example: when you paste your claude API token to authorize, it covers characters with *. But it seems like an LLM has hallucinated a limit of API key length and the tail of your key stays visible. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tempest_ 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I dont love it. Opus 5 is just a token burner. I use fable plan and spawn opus 4.8 workflows which seems to work alright. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 25 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
| [deleted] | |||||||||||||||||