Then show me a pattern of flouting regulations (which I can easily believe he has). His terrible views on unrelated issues are irrelevant.

Correct me if I'm wrong: Is the article about a badly acting LLM?

Facts and "irrelevant details" are not mutually exclusive.

> It would be bad enough if the data center was used to research cures to cancer, but instead it is creating nudes of children.

Sorry, but what it is being used for is irrelevant to whether it is flouting the laws.

As I said in my original comment, the reason I stopped reading was because the language was trying to bias readers. And as the responses show, they sure as Hell did.

It seems critical reading is becoming a lost skill.

I'll bite. The title is about ignoring regulations related to a data center. How is any of what I quoted relevant?

If the article were about Elon Musk's racist views, then by all means I'd be fine with it. But his (or Grok's) racism is irrelevant to the laws he is violating. Would it be OK if a well respected billionaire flouted those laws?

Not really, its a valid way to manage ones time, because if you deem the message to not be I the quality you expect, you can just find a better article.

I never claimed it was. Are you willing to read pointless stuff just because it's accurate?

The statement of irrelevant facts.

It's like criticizing Stallman's hygiene. Who cares?

Many such cases

This isn't a formal publication. This is the type of post that used to be celebrated in hacker culture. The type of post that purposefully flounders respectability politics even if it's just for aesthetic forms of rebellion. Clearly it's offending the type of people it meant to :)

> Pollution is bad but it's a different story if it's curing cancer vs making nudes of female politicians.

Completely disagree. That sort of reasoning is why plenty of African Americans were forcibly moved from their own properties in the 20th century. "The land will be put to great use!" (And in a lot of cases, it was - still wrong).